Posts On Patent Prosecution
No advertising, no sponsors, no pay-to-play nothing but pure patent prosecution bliss.
Giving Thanks for Real Reasoning: A PTAB Reminder on Obviousness
This Thanksgiving, I’m grateful for PTAB decisions that keep obviousness grounded in evidence. In a recent turkey-decoy appeal, the Board rejected an examiner’s broad “manufacturing cost” motivation as unsupported. A downward-facing tail may fool a gobbler, but vague rationales won’t fool the PTAB.
Keep reading
Claiming What Doesn’t Happen: Issues and Options
Claiming what does not happen can have issues, but there are options to making it work. Read about a recent PTAB decision illustrating one possible approach.
Keep reading
The Secondary Reference Trap
A recent PTAB decision highlights a common pitfall in obviousness practice — focusing on the wrong reference when arguing about modification of a reference making it unfit for its intended purpose.
Keep reading
It Looked Obvious, Until It Wasn’t:
When “wired vs. wireless” looks obvious, think again. A recent PTAB appeal shows how differences in environment, structure, and reasonable expectation of success can defeat an obviousness rejection — and why prosecutors should put those facts front and center
Keep reading
Intermediate Products and Anticipation: When “Almost” Doesn’t Count
Examiners sometimes rely on unfinished products to reject device claims—but as a recent PTAB decision shows, “almost” isn’t enough. We break down the case and share practical tips for responding to these nuanced rejections.
Keep reading
Mere Relative Dimensions in Patent Claims
It is not uncommon for examiners to dismiss dimensional claim limitations—especially relative dimensions—as mere design choices that don’t patentably distinguish over the prior art. Examiners often cite MPEP § 2144.04(IV)(a), which explains that a change in proportions of a prior art device is obvious unless there is some new function achieved. It’s an easy move for examiners to use this…
Keep reading
New Look
Mr. IP Law is pleased to announce it has migrated to WordPress with a new look. Look out for new posts to again keep you up to date on all of the latest patent prosecution trends.
Keep reading
From Baked Goods to Egg Patties: PTAB Cracks Examiner’s Overly-Broad Interpretation
Non-limiting statements do not necessarily mean that there is no limit at all in terms of the scope of disclosure.
Keep reading
The Limits of “Consisting Of” in Obviousness Arguments
See how examiners try to combat “consisting of” language in obviousness rejections.
Keep reading
Burgers, Electric Guitar, and Patent Law
Read about a recent PTAB decision on the Hard Rock Cafe’s Golden Solo Experience.
Keep readingSomething went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.
Disclaimer – Note that the views expressed herein do not represent the views of any law firm or client, and may not even represent the views of the author. This blog is NOT legal advice and is for informational purposes only. No attorney client relationship can be formed by reading this blog or using any of the information provided. The accuracy of the information provided has not been verified.
Mr. IP Law 