The PTAB confirms in a Honda appeal that system diagnostic inventions do not need to perform an action in response to the diagnostic determination to be patent eligible.
A new informative decision on Section 101 shows how an invention using a neural network is patentable under Section 101 and the most recent USPTO guidelines on subject matter eligibility.
The PTAB uses the specification’s explanation of technical issues addressed by the invention to find that the claims overcome Section 101 by integrating an abstract idea into a practical application under the USPTO’s Revised Eligibility Guidelines.
Patent searching for drafting is not the same as patent searching for examination. Special thanks to Eugene Lhymn for the inspiration related to this post.